Ed Whittingham — Jan. 16, 2012
An open letter from the Pembina Institute to Canadians
Dear friends,
As you may have noticed, the Harper government and the “Ethical Oil Inc” front group have been working to discredit groups like the Pembina Institute and our work on energy issues by claiming that we are a “foreign-funded,” “radical” organization advocating against the best interests of Canadians.
Allow us to set the record straight.
The truth about our funding
From year-to-year, on the order of one tenth of our revenue originates from “foreign” sources that share our sustainable energy goals. That puts us in the same boat as hundreds of other Canadian non-profit groups and companies who also work to shape Canadian public policy.
The other 90 per cent of our revenue comes from Canadian governments, companies, foundations and individuals interested in the innovative thinking we bring to sustainable energy challenges. We are proud of our ability to attract such diverse sources of revenue, and doing so ensures that we are independent and financially stable — as any Canadian company strives to be. It’s just good business.
As Canadians we have built for ourselves an open and globalized society, and energy is one of our most globalized resources. If we are going to move to a sustainable energy system around the world, one that ensures we prevent the worst scenarios of climate change, then we need to mobilize ideas and resources from around the world toward solving the most pressing energy challenges.
To call some “foreign” funding good (i.e. for oilsands companies) and some bad (i.e. for environmental groups) takes us in the wrong direction.
But we digress. The truth about our funding is that we need more of it — a lot more — to meet the growing demand for our work on helping Canada transition to sustainable energy.
We’re standing up for Canada — will you join us?
The Pembina Institute was founded 25 years ago by local landowners in Drayton Valley, Alberta, in response to the infamous Lodgepole sour gas blowout. The well blew for 68 days, two blowout specialists lost their lives, and on a bad day the rotten-egg odour of the hydrogen sulfide in the gas could be smelled as far away as Winnipeg, Manitoba. The interventions of the landowners in the industrial accident hearing that followed helped create environmental and safety regulations that changed the way natural gas was developed in Alberta.
Although we are now a national organization, we haven’t forgotten our rural Alberta roots. We understand the good and bad sides of oil and gas: the significant role that hydrocarbons currently play in creating jobs and economic prosperity, along with the risks to people and the environment when hydrocarbons are developed irresponsibly.
Today, even if developed responsibly, we see a long-term economic risk to relying on hydrocarbons. And we’re not alone.
New Alberta Premier Alison Redford said in her leadership platform that "hydrocarbons will not remain the world’s fuel of choice forever and Alberta must be prepared for the spread of alternative sources." Meanwhile a 2010 blue ribbon panel report from the Premier's Council for Economic Strategy argues that Albertans must plan for the eventuality that oilsands production will almost certainly be displaced at some point in the future by lower-cost and/or lower-emission alternatives.
With this kind of shift in prairie wind, now is the time to push for the transition to low-carbon, low-impact energy production.
At the Pembina Institute, we are not motivated by four-year political cycles or quarterly earnings reports, but by how we can aid this transition. We are motivated by helping to create a Canadian economy that will remain strong and competitive 20, 30 and 40 years from now by leading the way in new sectors such as clean energy and clean tech. We are motivated by the prospect of a clean energy industry that employs more people than a polluting energy industry.
And it doesn’t stop there. We want Canadians to be safe from the disastrous health and safety impacts of unfettered, weakly regulated, and weakly monitored oilsands development. And — as radical as this may sound — we want to preserve and protect our world-famous Canadian wilderness by ensuring that we do everything we can to minimize the impacts to our wilderness, fresh water and air quality from all forms of energy development.
After 40 years of developing the oilsands, Alberta still does not have regulated maximum limits on total environmental impact. Until such limits are put in place and enforced, no one can claim we are responsibly developing this resource.
We’d like to get back to work now.
While the attacks on our credibility are likely to continue, they aim to divert our energy and resources away from the work that we are committed to doing.
It’s time to turn our full attention back to the business of building a better Canada. There is much work to be done in 2012 and we would like your help.
If you are tired of pettiness and misinformation campaigns passing for debate, and you would rather see our leaders and your fellow Canadians equipped to discuss, debate and make decisions about critical energy issues based on facts and reason, not ideology and spin, then we need your help.
By subscribing to receive updates about the work that we’re doing, and inviting people in your network to do the same, you’ll be helping to ensure the debate is grounded in high-calibre research and focussed on pragmatic, sustainable solutions for Canada’s energy future.
Sincerely,
Ed Whittingham, Executive Director
The Pembina Institute
P.S. As always, we need all the financial support we can get. Please donate to the Pembina Institute. And yes, the contributions of like-minded citizens of the world are welcome!
Learn more about Climate Change, Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy, Pembina's Work in Alberta, Pembina's Work in British Columbia.
Read more blogs relating to Climate Change, Energy Efficiency, Green Economics, Oilsands, Renewable Energy, Transportation, Alberta, British Columbia, Federal Action, International, Oil & Gas, Pipelines, USA.







bruce edson — Jan 23, 2012 - 11:02 PM MT
It is not easy for any non-profit to get funding, especially large chunks of it. Getting grants, etc from large organizations/foundations is nothing new to say the least for any non profit in any sector! It is a primary duty of any non profit to stay true to its mandate. Coming down on so many non profits for accepting grants that harmonize with there mandate is pretty low. Cheers to Pembina and the other effected groups for standing up to the slander that is obviously a tactic with the goal of getting the Enbridge Pipeline in. Keep up your work and stay true to your mandate.
Chip — Jan 22, 2012 - 01:21 PM MT
This article is so packed with propaganda and lies I don not know where to start other than to say that youa re only appealing to your radical leftists funding base.
Well, the average working Albertan is on to your lies. We are working to see that no more tax dollars goes to you. We are going to end your little scheme whereby you funnel charitable donations to fund this propaganda by ending your charitable status.
We are going to question any public institution that hires your consulting services with complaints to MLA's.
You will answer to us now.
Better get used to it.
D. Yurchuk — Jan 16, 2012 - 11:02 PM MT
You really do not understand, do you? Without a strong economy, Alberta cannot contribute to sustainable energy. Energy is the key to our strength and there are many Game-changing examples of technology in action all over Alberta now. Many of these are a result of Alberta's activities in the oil sands and others are examples of other industries, at least partially funded by these same activities. Still others are a direct response fron groups like yours who are pushed beyond their normal limits by their need to respond to what they perceive as threats. Three examples, just off the top of mind are the wind turbine gerators that are springing up all over the province. Another example is the Alberta corporation that has developed a process to extract product from shale using recoverable propane instead of water. This process will not only produce cleaner natural gas all over the world but will more importantly, produce enough cheap gas to replace diesel in many of the world's most polluted economies. Third, thEre are now fuel cells being used to produce better and less polluting energy. And yes, there are those who will oppose each of these technologies. And yes, many of the opponents are foreign interests. And, finally, yes again, these same opponents will fund good groups for their opposition.
I wonder if you will let this note be published or if your own self interest will force you to erase it?
Don
Ed W, Pembina ExecDirector — Jan 17, 2012 - 10:01 PM MT
Mr. Yurchuk,
We support responsible development of the oilsands and other sources of energy. In the last two decades, we've been part of all the major oilsands planning processes and groups, participated in all the major development hearings, and have collaborated directly with most of the major producers on environmental management and technology improvements through our consulting work (http://www.pembina.org/consulting). We are a vocal critic of industry and government when evidence shows that development is not taking place in a responsible manner and impacts are not being managed adequately. Pembina thinks that the Gateway pipeline is currently unnecessary - we still have 1m bbl/day of excess pipeline capacity - and that it's premature to put in more capacity in advance of a credible plan for responsible development of the oilsands. Using the examples you mention, we also suspect that we can create more and longer lasting jobs with less risk.
PANDORA — Jan 16, 2012 - 05:50 PM MT
Awesome POST! The only thing that you need to do now i close your website. That is the solution to climate change!
gp — Jan 16, 2012 - 01:40 PM MT
"dislike"
Lana Gunnlaugson — Jan 16, 2012 - 12:25 PM MT
In full support of your work! Keep up the amazing efforts because ethical oil just doesn't exist:)
PANDORA — Jan 16, 2012 - 05:51 PM MT
are you sure?
Post new comment