Julia Kilpatrick — Jan. 22, 2010
The spotlight was on the U.S. in this week's climate news, with the surprise election of Republican Senator Scott Brown in Massachusetts on Tuesday. Brown's win stripped the Democrats of the 60-seat "super majority" in the Senate, and sparked widespread speculation about how the power shift could affect the success or failure of climate legislation in the U.S. — and, ultimately, here in Canada.
Business leaders in the U.S. responded to those concerns with a call to action. On Thursday, the CEOs of more than 80 prominent American companies — including Exelon, Virgin America, eBay and PG&E — released an open letter calling on President Obama and members of Congress to "move quickly to enact comprehensive climate and energy legislation that will create jobs and enhance U.S. competitiveness."
Himlayan glaciers continue to melt, though not as rapidly as predicted in 2007 by the IPCC In science news, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) came
under scrutiny this week after a mistaken claim about the rate at which
Himalayan glaciers are melting came
to light. While the incident is awkward for the IPCC, Bryan
Walsh explains in Time magazine
why the slower-than-predicted melting of Himalayan glaciers is still a serious
issue. (It's also worth noting that, while the IPCC acknowledges
the mistake — which was never included in the more widely-read "summary for
policymakers" or synthesis report — resulted from "the poor application of
well-established IPCC procedures in this instance," many IPCC projections are
conservative underestimates. Likely
sea-level rise, for example, was recently projected to be triple the IPCC's
2007 estimates.)
2009 Christopher Booker Prize Finally, brandishing a homemade recycled trophy and a sharp
tongue, George
Monbiot takes on climate change skeptics in a satirical column in the Guardian, awarding the first international award for spreading misinformation about climate change. Wondering
what qualifies columnist
John Tomlinson to win this illustrious prize? In another blog post, Monbiot
unpacks 38
"magnificent errors" published in just one of Tomlinson's columns.
A final note to anyone thinking of running for next year's prize: there won't be one. Monbiot says it's because he just "can't face the thought of wading through all that rubbish again."
(Frankly, neither could we.)
Learn more about Climate Change.
Read more blogs relating to Climate Change.







Warrick Walker — Feb 01, 2010 - 09:37 PM MT
I'm shocked that the Monbiot column cited above passes for scientific journalism. Not only does Monbiot chiefly argue by assertion, he compounds his ignorance by citing the IPCC and the MET, two of the organizations embroiled in the "climategate scandal" and thus bereft of any credibility.
While on the subject of credibility, it's time the UN dumped MR. Pachauri. His conflict of interest has become so ubiquitous that the whole organization is becoming an even bigger laughing stock than before.
All over the world, in respected newspapers and journals, stories blowing the lid off the climate con are being posted almost daily. It's time to jettison this charade and get back to real science.
Oh, am I the only one who thinks Al Gore is conspicuous by his absence? I say bring on Lord Moncton and let the debate begin. What;s that? You say Al won't risk it? Imagine that!
Post new comment