<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="utf-8">
    <channel>
        <title>Pembina Institute's Green Economics News</title>
        <description>Latest media releases, op-eds, publications and blog posts from Green Economics.</description>
        <link>http://www.pembina.org/economics</link>
        <language>en</language>
        <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs>
        <generator> </generator>
        <managingEditor>rssadmin@pembina.org</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>rssadmin@pembina.org</webMaster>
                <item>
            <title>Helping Calgary meet its greenhouse gas emissions targets (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/608</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/608</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently, Calgary City Council voted overwhelmingly in favour of adopting its first citywide greenhouse gas plan. The plan aims to reduce the city’s emissions by 20 per cent by 2020, and 80 per cent by 2050, below 2005 levels and I’m thrilled to say that the Pembina Institute’s community services consulting group helped to write it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Jesse Row</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Carbon pricing and Canada’s New West Partnership: An $8 billion opportunity  (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/607</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/607</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The premiers of British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan have &lt;a href=&quot;http://alberta.ca/acn/201112/3168639D90768-C2F1-4291-5E84BD2FEE2D80CF.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;pledged&lt;/a&gt; to meet with the federal government to discuss a national energy strategy and the related issue of regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Before that meeting happens, let’s examine their efforts to &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/422&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;price carbon&lt;/a&gt;, a critical component of any cost-effective approach to dealing with climate change.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matt Horne</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The truth about our funding (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/601</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/601</guid>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;loud&quot;&gt;An open letter from the Pembina Institute to Canadians&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear friends,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you may have noticed, the Harper government and the “Ethical Oil Inc” front group have been working to discredit groups like the Pembina Institute and our work on energy issues by claiming that we are a “foreign-funded,” “radical” organization advocating against the best interests of Canadians.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Allow us to set the record straight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Ed Whittingham</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Government statements on Gateway hearings show Canada is open for business, closed to criticism (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/op-ed/2302</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/op-ed/2302</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently Canada is open for business but closed to criticism, no matter how constructive. This is the clearest conclusion that can be drawn from Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/an-open-letter-from-natural-resources-minister-joe-oliver/article2295599/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;open letter&lt;/a&gt; to Canadians, in which he attacks advocates of responsible oil-sands development as “radicals” and dismisses the concerns of thousands of Canadians who want to have a say in the decision of whether to build Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Nathan Lemphers</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Ontario Feed-in-Tariff: 2011 Review (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2299</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2299</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In response to the government's two-year feed-in tariff (FIT) review process, the Green Energy Act Alliance and Shine Ontario Association have joined forces to present a clear path for renewable energy in Ontario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis, Paul Gipe, Green Energy Act Alliance, Shine ONtario</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Canada’s Kyoto math doesn’t add up (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/599</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/599</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday afternoon, my colleagues and I were trying to make sense of the outcomes from the Durban, South Africa, climate change conference. Was it an exercise in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/climate-summit-was-a-pathetic-exercise-in-deceit/article2267900/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;deceit&lt;/a&gt; or did it offer some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/11/global-climate-change-treaty-durban?intcmp=122&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;glimmer&lt;/a&gt; of hope? Before we could fully answer those questions, news broke that Canada was formally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/12/12/pol-kent-kyoto-pullout.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;withdrawing&lt;/a&gt; from the Kyoto Protocol. Just hours off the plane from Durban, Environment Minister Kent made the announcement that Canada would no longer be a party to the world’s only climate change treaty.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matt Horne</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Attacks on environmental group supporters are disingenuous and disturbing (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/598</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/598</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday the reputation of the Pembina Institute and that of the British government was attacked in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.troymedia.com/blog/2011/12/11/why-does-the-pembina-institute-need-foreign-money-to-fight-the-oil-sands/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;column&lt;/a&gt; by Kathryn Marshall, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kathrynmarshall.ca/bio/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;professional oilsands booster&lt;/a&gt;. It doesn’t seem too much to ask of someone who regularly writes commentary in the news media to do a little fact checking. However, this basic journalistic standard appears to have escaped Marshall, as her commentary repeats many &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.troymedia.com/blog/2011/12/11/rebuttal-from-pembina-institute-to-ethicaloil-org-commentary/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;misleading or downright false statements&lt;/a&gt; about the Pembina Institute and the nature of our work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Ed Whittingham</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Canada’s performance and positions in Durban (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/595</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/595</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
The
second and final week of the UN climate negotiations in Durban, South Africa is
now underway. 
In
our view, a wealthy country such as Canada that is serious about reaching an agreement, would be doing three things.
Let's
take a look at where Canada stands on these points. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>P.J. Partington</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Looking to Canada’s economic past for wisdom on climate change (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/op-ed/2293</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/op-ed/2293</guid>
            <description></description>
            <author>Matt Horne</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>New report highlights dangers associated with tar sands pipeline to British Columbia  (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2290</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2290</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A new report highlights the dangers associated with transporting tar sands oil by Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway project, both along the pipeline pathway and on B.C.'s sensitive coast, which massive oil tankers would be navigating for the first time. The report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Pembina Institute and Living Oceans Society has also been endorsed by nine British Columbia organizations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Pembina Institute, Living Oceans Society, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Recommendations to weaken the B.C. carbon tax would be a step backwards (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/592</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/592</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Working on climate change issues can be challenging,
especially when you compare what climate scientists say needs to be done with
what politicians are (or are not) doing. Tuesday was a particularly challenging
day. That's when the British Columbia Select Standing
Committee on Finance and Government Services released 75 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leg.bc.ca/cmt/39thparl/session-4/fgs/reports/PDF/Rpt-FGS-39-4-1stRpt-Budget2012Consultations-2011-NOV-15.pdf&quot;&gt;recommendations&lt;/a&gt;
for the 2012 B.C. budget, five of which discuss B.C.'s carbon
tax and cap-and-trade rules and convey little interest in building on the
positive steps already taken to address climate change in the province.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matt Horne</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina Institute Comments on Canada’s Proposed Reduction of Carbon Dioxide from Coal-­fired Generation of Electricity Regulations (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2280</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2280</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Coal power is one of the worst contributors to global climate
change, air pollution, acid rain precursors and atmospheric mercury emissions. Yet, in Canada, coal accounts for the majority of electricity generation in Alberta,
Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia and is significant in both Ontario and New
Brunswick. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Several provinces have
taken strong leadership roles in tackling coal power, however, and federal limits for industrial GHGs should support and
supplement this action, with an emphasis on achieving national and
international commitments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!--
--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are the Pembina Institute's comments and recommendations for Canada's proposed &lt;em&gt;Reduction of Carbon Dioxide from Coal-fired Generation of Electricity Regulations. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matt Horne, Tim Weis, P.J. Partington</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title> Fact: Green energy is good for Ontario (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/578</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/578</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Ontarians head to the polls
on Thursday to elect the next provincial government, at the close of an
election campaign where green energy has emerged as a hot-button issue. As the
rhetoric has escalated on all sides of the debate, Ontario voters have also had
to wade through a great deal of misinformation about their energy options.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Cherise Burda</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Thinking outside the pipeline: Why American decision-makers must consider the true costs of Keystone XL (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/575</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/575</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The clock is ticking for the U.S. State
Department to evaluate the proposed Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Nathan Lemphers</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>New analysis compares Ontario election promises on clean energy, climate action and sustainable transportation  (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2271</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2271</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A detailed platform
analysis released today by the Pembina Institute compares the commitments the Ontario Liberal,
NDP and Progressive Conservative parties have made on a range of sustainable
energy priorities. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The analysis looks at where the parties stand on issues such
as investing in renewable power generation, reducing greenhouse gas emissions,
creating incentives for energy conservation and expanding transit systems. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Cherise Burda, Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Analysis of Ontario political platforms  (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2268</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2268</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The Pembina Institute's detailed platform
analysis compares the commitments the Ontario Liberal,
NDP and Progressive Conservative parties have made on a range of sustainable
energy priorities. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The analysis looks at where the parties stand on issues such
as investing in renewable power generation, reducing greenhouse gas emissions,
creating incentives for energy conservation and expanding transit systems. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis, Cherise Burda, Sachi Gibson</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Frequently asked questions about green energy in Ontario (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2272</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2272</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
Ontario has taken the laudable step of closing
down its entire fleet of coal-fired power plants — a move supported across
partisan lines. This, however, is but one of the many changes that is coming to
Ontario's electricity system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pembina.org/contact/75&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; Tim Weis&lt;/a&gt;, director of renewable energy &amp;amp; energy efficiency, answers some of the most frequently asked questions about the role that renewable energy could play in the future of electricity generation in Ontario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Des promoteurs du gaz de schiste nous citent de manière trompeuse (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/573</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/573</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Nous cherchions,
avec notre étude, à contribuer à un débat bien informé, s'appuyant sur les
meilleures recherches scientifiques et économiques. Quelle déception, alors,
que deux des principaux promoteurs du gaz de schiste au Québec aient plutôt choisi
d'utiliser notre rapport pour faire des relations publiques trompeuses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matthew Bramley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Quebec shale gas proponents misrepresent Pembina study (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/blog/572</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/blog/572</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;At the Pembina Institute we hope that our work stimulates well-informed debate, based on the best available science and economic analysis. It's therefore very disappointing that two of the most prominent proponents of shale gas development in Quebec have chosen to use one of our reports as part of a misleading public relations exercise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matthew Bramley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Did Ontarians get a good deal with the Green Energy Act? (op-ed)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/op-ed/2275</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/op-ed/2275</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
The
Green Energy Act brought Ontario new investment, jobs and manufacturing — not
to mention clean sources of energy. But Ontario is now paying premium prices
for that clean electricity, and many Ontarians are wondering if they got a good
deal. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

