<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="utf-8">
    <channel>
        <title>Pembina Institute News</title>
        <description>Latest media releases, op-eds, publications and blog posts from the Pembina Institute.</description>
        <link>http://www.pembina.org/</link>
        <language>en</language>
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs>
        <generator> </generator>
        <managingEditor>rssadmin@pembina.org</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>rssadmin@pembina.org</webMaster>
                <item>
            <title>External review affirms quality of UN-backed climate research, suggests changes (blog)</title>
            <link>http://climate.pembina.org/blog/105</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://climate.pembina.org/blog/105</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday
the InterAcademy Council (IAC), a collaboration among the world's leading
national science academies, issued its &lt;a href=&quot;http://reviewipcc.interacademycouncil.net/report.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) — the UN body mandated
by governments to conduct regular, comprehensive assessments of the science of
climate change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UN
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon had asked the IAC to conduct an independent review
of IPCC processes and procedures after it emerged that the last major IPCC
report contained &lt;a href=&quot;http://climate.pembina.org/blog/104&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a few errors&lt;/a&gt; in the section that projects future impacts of climate change. As
numerous distinguished scientists have &lt;a href=&quot;http://climate.pembina.org/blog/89&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;pointed out&lt;/a&gt;, these errors have no effect on the overwhelming evidence that the
world is warming, that greenhouse gases from human activities are mostly to
blame, and that we face severe global impacts if we don't act urgently to cut emissions. Yesterday's
IAC report does not change that picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Matthew Bramley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina reacts to study showing oil sands mines contribute heavy metals to the Athabasca River (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2070</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2070</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Simon Dyer, Oil Sands Program
Director at the Pembina Institute, responded to the release of the peer-reviewed paper &quot;Oil
sands development contributes elements toxic at low concentrations to the
Athabasca River and its tributaries.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Oil Sands Environmental Coalition calls on panel to reject Total oil sands mine application (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2069</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2069</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The Oil Sands Environmental Coalition filed a submission calling on the Joint Review Panel to reject Total E&amp;amp;P Canada's Joslyn North Mine Project application.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Terra Simieritsch</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>OSEC submission against Total Joslyn North Mine Application (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2068</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2068</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The Oil Sands Environmental Coalition filed a submission calling on the Joint Review Panel to reject Total E&amp;amp;P Canada's Joslyn North Mine Project application.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Pembina Institute et al.</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>When it comes to enforcing its regulations, is the ERCB more bark than bite? (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/81</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/81</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
When the Energy Resources
Conservation Board (ERCB) rolled out new regulations to manage oil sands
tailings production (Directive
074) in February 2009, my colleagues and I were hopeful that a new, tougher
approach to regulating oil sands development had begun. But based on past
experience, we were cautiously optimistic at best.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the time, my colleague
Jennifer Grant responded: &quot;Given the very weak track record of the ERCB and the Government of
Alberta in implementing and enforcing oil sands environmental regulations, it
may take two to five years to determine if this directive has teeth.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Dan Woynillowicz</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Allegations against climate science continue to unravel (blog)</title>
            <link>http://climate.pembina.org/blog/104</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://climate.pembina.org/blog/104</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
Earlier this year, we published a backgrounder assessing recent controversies
and claims surrounding the integrity of climate science. There have been
several new developments since then, so we thought it would be useful to
summarize the main ones.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In line with the earlier investigations summarized in our
backgrounder, the more recent reviews find that the allegations made about the
&quot;climategate&quot; stolen e-mails affair or errors in volume II of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) are either
baseless or have no bearing on the case for urgent reductions in greenhouse gas
pollution. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>PJ Partington</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Environmental groups challenge Syncrude tailings plan approvals  (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2066</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2066</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The Energy Resources Conservation Board's approval of Syncrude's
tailings management plan is unlawful and must be revoked immediately,
Ecojustice said today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ecojustice, acting on behalf of the Pembina Institute and Water Matters, has filed &lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.pembina.org/reports/directive-074-lt-ercb-re-review-and-variance-august-24-2010.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;an application&lt;/a&gt;
with the ERCB requesting approval be withdrawn until management plans
are brought in line with ERCB's tailings management directive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The Pembina Foundation Annual Report 2009 (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2065</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2065</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;This report features projects supported by The Pembina Foundation
for Environmental Research and Education in 2009, a summary
of the foundation's 2009 financial statements, and a list of supporters.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Barb Bundt</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Bridging the Gulf between commuting and oil impacts (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/80</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/80</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
&quot;Windmills not Oil Spills&quot; ­— I saw this bumper sticker
during the BP disaster. A Google search unearthed some even more provocative bumper stickers: &quot;Plug the Damn Hole!&quot; and &quot;Way to go Gashole.&quot; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I'm hoping the vehicle owners that brandish these
stickers will also realize the irony of an anti-oil sticker on a
gasoline-fuelled bumper, regardless of its tagline. Surely they understand the
connection between the Gulf disaster and their own steering wheel? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Cherise Burda</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Report recommends five steps to cut Ontario's oil use, protect the environment and save money (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2062</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2062</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gulf&lt;/em&gt; highlights the
connection between the choices made by commuters in Ontario, and the negative
impacts of oil extraction in North America in light of the recent oil spill in the
Gulf of Mexico and ongoing ecological impacts from oil sands development. It
focuses exclusively on personal transportation — how Ontarians get around every
day — and presents five key actions to reduce oil use based on policy
changes that are already underway in the province. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Cherise Burda, Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Bridging the Gulf (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2063</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2063</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gulf&lt;/em&gt; highlights the connection
between the choices made by commuters in Ontario, and the negative impacts of
oil extraction in North America in light of the recent oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico and ongoing ecological impacts from oil sands development. It focuses
exclusively on personal transportation — how Ontarians get around every day —
and presents five key actions to reduce oil demand based on policy changes that
are already underway in the province.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Cherise Burda, Alison Bailie, Graham Haines</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina Reacts: Report reveals oilsands having negative impact on Canada's freshwater (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2064</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2064</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Simon Dyer, oilsands program director for
the Pembina Institute, responded to today's release of the Liberal members'
of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable
Development report from the committee's study of the impact of oilsands
development on Canada's freshwater.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Environmental groups echo First Nations call for caribou protection  (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2067</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2067</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Environmental groups have joined with four
Alberta First Nations to urge the federal environment minister to provide
emergency protection for caribou herds in northeastern Alberta, Ecojustice said
today.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ecojustice, acting on
behalf of the Alberta Wilderness Association, the Pembina Institute and the
Sierra Club of Canada Prairie Chapter, &lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.pembina.org/reports/caribou-sara-lt-minister-august-17-2010final-br.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;filed a letter&lt;/a&gt; today to Environment
Minister Jim Prentice, demanding that he use emergency protection provisions in
Canada's Species at Risk Actto
protect caribou habitat in northeastern Alberta.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>“Tell it like it is” oil sands campaign requires facts (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/79</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/79</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
We think it's a shame the government of Alberta doesn't hold themselves
to the same standard they hold those that disagree with them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Case in point: Jerry Bellikka, spokesperson from Premier Ed
Stelmach's office, said: &quot;If you compare overall emissions in Ontario
and Quebec with Alberta's, setting aside growth ... I think you would find both
those provinces are significantly higher than Alberta.&quot; This is plain
wrong. Either Bellikka is unaware of the facts or choosing to ignore them. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina and Water Matters React: Noncompliance with tailings directive 074 a growing concern  (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2061</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2061</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Simon Dyer, oil sands program director for the Pembina Institute, and
Joe Obad, associate director of Water Matters, responded to today's
announcement that the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) has
approved Imperial Oil’s Kearl oil sands tailings plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Simon Dyer</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Green energy upgrade protects Ontarians from rising nuclear costs   (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2060</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2060</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Choosing to scale
up green energy to replace the retiring Pickering nuclear station is more
affordable for Ontarians than buying expensive replacement reactors, says a
report released today by Renewable is Doable, an alliance of organizations
including the Pembina Institute, the Canadian Environmental Law Association and
Greenpeace.  Last summer, Ontario
suspended its purchase of two new replacement reactors when their cost
reportedly topped $26 billion — $20 billion more than expected in 2007. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Renewable Is Doable Group</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Ontario's Green Energy Plan 2.0 (publication)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/pub/2059</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/pub/2059</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;This Renewable is Doable report outlines how Ontario could save money by replacing the retiring Pickering nuclear station with green energy options.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Renewable Is Doable Group, Tim Weis</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>The truth about tailings (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/78</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/78</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;
Some of the facts in a
report I authored were recently challenged. The report, &lt;em&gt;Northern Lifeblood - Empowering Northern Leaders to Protect the
McKenzie River Basin,&lt;/em&gt; investigated current and future threats to the basin,
including the risks associated with the 170 square kilometres of toxic tailings
lakes in the Athabasca watershed. And it's the facts surrounding those toxic
tailings lakes that were questioned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our report findings are carefully
referenced, citing government, industry and academic, peer-reviewed documents. Nonetheless,
Suncor Energy raised concerns with our findings in a letter
to the editor printed in the Edmonton Journal. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Jennifer Grant</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pembina reacts to Stelmach oil sands PR at Council of the Federation (media release)</title>
            <link>http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2058</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.pembina.org/media-release/2058</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In response to comments made by Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach at a Council of the Federation meeting,  Marlo Raynolds, Executive Director of the Pembina Institute, responds that other Canadian provinces clearly demonstrate that you don't need to
increase pollution in order to achieve strong economic growth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Marlo Raynolds</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Will Alberta learn from BP's mistakes? (blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/77</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.oilsandswatch.org/blog/77</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, U.S. President Barack Obama said,
&quot;the long battle to stop the leak and contain the oil is finally close to
coming to an end.&quot; As this catastrophe transitions from crisis to clean up and
compensation, many are already starting to ask questions about whether BP and
the U.S. government acted responsibly in the face of the spill. Few will ask
whether BP's public relations job was effective. In fact, many have criticized BP for dedicating significant
resources (upwards of $50 million) to its public
relations efforts in lieu of taking more aggressive action.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, the oil sands public relations
battle continues across Canada and in Washington D.C. Yesterday, another public
relations chapter opened with the Government of Alberta launching a $268,000 ad
campaign, commencing a &quot;full court press&quot; hitting national print
publications, the Internet and possibly radio.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <author>Danielle Droitsch</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>
